NO EN Login

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS)

Bibliographic Information

International Title:

Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS)


8756-758X         Period: [1985 .. ]


1460-2695         Period: [1985 .. ]



Country of publication:

United Kingdom


Publishing House:

John Wiley & Sons

ITAR Code:


NPI Scientific Field:

Mechanical engineering


✅ Scientific editorial board
✅ Peer reviewed
✅ Min. national authorship
✅ Approved ISSN

Open Access

 Included in UNIT agreement - Last checked  2021-09-09
Wiley agreement with UNIT includes articles with author associated with one of the institutions: Show [+]
Akershus universitetssykehus HF
Barne-, ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet
Departementenes Sikkerhets- og Serviceorganisasjon
Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt
Handelshøyskolen BI
Høgskolen i Innlandet
Høgskolen i Molde - Vitenskapelig høgskole i logistikk
Høgskolen i Østfold
Høgskulen i Volda
Høgskulen på Vestlandet
Høyskolen Kristiania - Ernst G Mortensens Stiftelse
Institutt For Fredsforskning
Lovisenberg diakonale høgskole
NILU - Stiftelsen Norsk Institutt For Luftforskning
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
Nord Universitet
Norges Geotekniske Institutt
Norges miljø- og biovitenskapelige universitet
Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet
Norsk institutt for naturforskning
Norsk institutt for vannforskning
Norsk Polarinstitutt
OsloMet - Storbyuniversitetet
Regionsenter for barn og unges psykiske helse, helseregion Øst og Sør
Statistisk sentralbyrå
Sykehuset Østfold HF
Sørlandet sykehus HF
UiO : Universitetsbiblioteket
UiT - Norges arktiske universitet
Universitetet i Agder
Universitetet i Bergen
Universitetet i Stavanger
Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge
Universitetssenteret på Svalbard
Vestre Viken HF
VID vitenskapelige høgskole
Plan S: Journal Checker Tool [+]

Scientific level placements and Norwegian HEIs publication points

Year Scientific Level Author Shares Publication Points
2022 2
2021 2
2020 2 5.875 26.8535
2019 2 7.2512 35.1723
2018 2 3.9667 25.884
2017 2 2.0179 13.9294
2016 1 0.5774 1.9263
2015 1 1.5 1.7071
2014 1 0.0 0.0
2013 1 1.6667 1.6667
2012 1 0.67 0.67
2011 1 0.67 0.67
2010 1 0.0 0.0
2009 1 0.0 0.0
2008 1 1.0 1.0
2007 1 0.75 0.75
2006 1 0.66 0.66
2005 1 0.81 0.81
2004 1 0.0 0.0
Published in May the following year


Comments regarding updates on the publication channel are only visible for you and the advisors. Comments regarding the scientific quality and levels will be public.

Login to comment
Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures (FFEMS) journal has been considered as “Level 2” according to NSD. However, their reviewing process takes a considerably short period compared with other “Level 2” journals. It is suspicious about their reviewing process because usually most of the expert reviewers are busy and generally take more than the assigned time period to provide constructive reviews. I have given an example of such published articles, which have been taken considerably a short time duration.
Example 1,,
The paper has been;
• Received 19th of December
• Revised 25th of December
• Accepted 27th of December
Example 2;
The paper has been;
• Received 16th of September
• Revised 25th of October
• Accepted 28th of October
I have recently heard that there are cases of author creates bogus email accounts for proposed reviewers. i.e. I am not sure that it is the exact reason of such a fast reviewing process for example 1 and example 2. To increase research credibility and minimize unethical practices, I would greatly appreciate if you can investigate the affiliations and emails of the blind reviewers used by FFEMS to review example 1 and example 2. Also, reconsider and reevaluate the suitability if it is really suitable as LEVEL 2 journal. My recommendation is to make a through reevaluation. I also noticed that main editorial is from China. Making open access involves financial contributions, we need to make very careful investigation.
However, we have had very good experience with some open access journals in which they take considerable time 2-3 months to review with very good blind reviews. My main question: I am an associate editor to ASME OMAE journal. I my self find very difficult reviewers to get the reviewing done within 3 months. Some occasions it take about 12-16 months to get first, second and/or third review. A PhD student’s article accepting within a short duration makes significantly suspicious. Some of the PhD students approached me and highlighted this issues related to FFEMS. Hence, to develop trust and ethical practices among PhD students and research itself, we may have take a closer look on this matter.
Please follow the link below:
Average Duration of Peer Review * Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Sort of slow, 4-8 Week(s)
Competitiveness * Data from Authors: Easy

Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills
Postbox 1093, 5809 Bergen
Phone: (+47) 55 30 38 00

The Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers collects information from other sources and registers. We will endeavour to keep the information up to date and accurate, but we do not accept any liability in relation to any errors or outdated data.